Files
lambda-sub/theory/Metaterm.v
T

164 lines
5.4 KiB
V

From Stdlib Require Import List Bool Arith Lia PeanoNat.
Import ListNotations.
From LambdaSub Require Import ExecReducer Binding.
Inductive mtrm : Type :=
| mBVar : nat -> mtrm
| mFVar : atom -> mtrm
| mMVar : atom -> list atom -> mtrm
| mApp : mtrm -> mtrm -> mtrm
| mLam : mtrm -> mtrm
| mESub : mtrm -> mtrm -> mtrm.
Fixpoint mfvs (t : mtrm) : list atom :=
match t with
| mBVar _ => []
| mFVar x => [x]
| mMVar x d => x :: d
| mApp a b => mfvs a ++ mfvs b
| mLam a => mfvs a
| mESub a b => mfvs a ++ mfvs b
end.
Fixpoint lift_m (k : nat) (t : mtrm) : mtrm :=
match t with
| mBVar n => if Nat.ltb n k then mBVar n else mBVar (S n)
| mFVar x => mFVar x
| mMVar x d => mMVar x d
| mApp a b => mApp (lift_m k a) (lift_m k b)
| mLam a => mLam (lift_m (S k) a)
| mESub a b => mESub (lift_m (S k) a) (lift_m k b)
end.
Fixpoint open_rec_m (k : nat) (u : mtrm) (t : mtrm) : mtrm :=
match t with
| mBVar n => if Nat.eqb n k then lift_m k u else mBVar n
| mFVar x => mFVar x
| mMVar x d => mMVar x d
| mApp a b => mApp (open_rec_m k u a) (open_rec_m k u b)
| mLam a => mLam (open_rec_m (S k) u a)
| mESub a b => mESub (open_rec_m (S k) u a) (open_rec_m k u b)
end.
Fixpoint close_rec_m (x : atom) (k : nat) (t : mtrm) : mtrm :=
match t with
| mBVar n => mBVar n
| mFVar y => if Nat.eqb y x then mBVar k else mFVar y
| mMVar y d => mMVar y d
| mApp a b => mApp (close_rec_m x k a) (close_rec_m x k b)
| mLam a => mLam (close_rec_m x (S k) a)
| mESub a b => mESub (close_rec_m x (S k) a) (close_rec_m x k b)
end.
Fixpoint of_trm (t : trm) : mtrm :=
match t with
| BVar n => mBVar n
| FVar x => mFVar x
| App a b => mApp (of_trm a) (of_trm b)
| Lam a => mLam (of_trm a)
| ESub a b => mESub (of_trm a) (of_trm b)
end.
Lemma of_trm_fvs : forall t, mfvs (of_trm t) = fvs t.
Proof. induction t; simpl; [reflexivity | reflexivity | rewrite IHt1, IHt2; reflexivity | rewrite IHt; reflexivity | rewrite IHt1, IHt2; reflexivity]. Qed.
Lemma of_trm_lift : forall t k, of_trm (lift k t) = lift_m k (of_trm t).
Proof.
induction t; intros k; simpl.
- destruct (Nat.ltb n k); reflexivity.
- reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt1, IHt2. reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt. reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt1, IHt2. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma of_trm_open : forall t k u,
of_trm (open_rec k u t) = open_rec_m k (of_trm u) (of_trm t).
Proof.
induction t; intros k u; simpl.
- destruct (Nat.eqb n k) eqn:E; [| reflexivity].
apply Nat.eqb_eq in E. subst n. simpl. rewrite of_trm_lift. reflexivity.
- reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt1, IHt2. reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt. reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt1, IHt2. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma of_trm_close : forall t x k,
of_trm (close_rec x k t) = close_rec_m x k (of_trm t).
Proof.
induction t; intros x k; simpl.
- reflexivity.
- destruct (Nat.eqb a x); reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt1, IHt2. reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt. reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt1, IHt2. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma of_trm_injective : forall t t', of_trm t = of_trm t' -> t = t'.
Proof.
induction t; intros t' H; destruct t'; simpl in H; try discriminate.
- injection H as H. f_equal. exact H.
- injection H as H. f_equal. exact H.
- injection H as H1 H2. f_equal; [apply IHt1 | apply IHt2]; assumption.
- injection H as H. f_equal. apply IHt. exact H.
- injection H as H1 H2. f_equal; [apply IHt1 | apply IHt2]; assumption.
Qed.
Print Assumptions of_trm_fvs.
Print Assumptions of_trm_lift.
Print Assumptions of_trm_open.
Print Assumptions of_trm_close.
Print Assumptions of_trm_injective.
Lemma mfvs_lift_m : forall t k, mfvs (lift_m k t) = mfvs t.
Proof.
induction t; intros k; simpl.
- destruct (Nat.ltb n k); reflexivity.
- reflexivity.
- reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt1, IHt2. reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt. reflexivity.
- rewrite IHt1, IHt2. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma mfvs_close_m : forall t x k y, In y (mfvs (close_rec_m x k t)) -> In y (mfvs t).
Proof.
induction t; intros x k y H; simpl in *.
- destruct H.
- destruct (Nat.eqb a x) eqn:E.
+ destruct H.
+ destruct H as [Hy | Hf]. subst y. simpl. left. reflexivity. destruct Hf.
- exact H.
- apply in_app_iff in H as [H|H]; apply in_app_iff.
+ left. apply (IHt1 x k y). exact H.
+ right. apply (IHt2 x k y). exact H.
- apply (IHt x (S k) y). exact H.
- apply in_app_iff in H as [H|H]; apply in_app_iff.
+ left. apply (IHt1 x (S k) y). exact H.
+ right. apply (IHt2 x k y). exact H.
Qed.
Lemma mfvs_open_m : forall t k u y,
In y (mfvs (open_rec_m k u t)) -> In y (mfvs u) \/ In y (mfvs t).
Proof.
induction t; intros k u y H; simpl in *.
- destruct (Nat.eqb n k) eqn:E.
+ apply Nat.eqb_eq in E. subst n. simpl in H.
left. rewrite <- (mfvs_lift_m u k). exact H.
+ simpl in H. destruct H.
- right. exact H.
- right. exact H.
- apply in_app_iff in H as [H|H].
+ destruct (IHt1 k u y H) as [Hl|Hr]. left; exact Hl. right; apply in_app_iff; left; exact Hr.
+ destruct (IHt2 k u y H) as [Hl|Hr]. left; exact Hl. right; apply in_app_iff; right; exact Hr.
- destruct (IHt (S k) u y H) as [Hl|Hr]. left; exact Hl. right; exact Hr.
- apply in_app_iff in H as [H|H].
+ destruct (IHt1 (S k) u y H) as [Hl|Hr]. left; exact Hl. right; apply in_app_iff; left; exact Hr.
+ destruct (IHt2 k u y H) as [Hl|Hr]. left; exact Hl. right; apply in_app_iff; right; exact Hr.
Qed.
Print Assumptions mfvs_lift_m.
Print Assumptions mfvs_close_m.
Print Assumptions mfvs_open_m.